Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Logged-in users will also see a "Revert" link for versions other than the current one. Click on a Revert link to make the change. If the image is at Wikimedia Commons you must click through to the image page there to do the revert. Then scroll down to the thumbnails. Beside the thumbnail you wish there will be the word "Revert".
If you revert by manually changing the text to the old version, they will not receive a notification, which some editors appreciate. If the edits you revert are clearly disruptive or vandalism , it may be better not to notify the disruptor or vandal of your correction, by reverting manually.
Subversion is a manpower-intensive strategy and many groups lack the manpower and political and social connections to carry out subversive activities. [5] However, actions taken by terrorists may have a subversive effect on society. Subversion can imply the use of insidious, dishonest, monetary, or violent methods to bring about such change.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Go to the old version. Click "edit". Add summary and save. If there were an "edit this version (for reversion purposes only!)" button in the diff-viewing page, it'd help: Check the diff. Click "edit". Add summary and save. I propose that. (In fact, if there were a "revert to this version with summary ____" form on the diff page, it'd be even ...
Restoring part of a reverted edit is a recommended practice in online collaborative writing.. Often when an article version contains more than one disagreeable passage, it is easy to revert to a previous version.
The Inbox style setting changes how your messages appear in AOL Mail. This setting is enabled at an account level, which means your preferences will carry over to the desktop site, the mobile site, and the AOL app.
Some editors may choose to voluntarily follow a one-revert rule: If you revert a change and someone re-reverts it, discuss it with the re-reverter rather than reverting it a second time. In a situation where two editors disagree, if both follow this rule, the history will show two reversions (one by each editor) before discussion starts.