Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia brings free knowledge to the world. Please consider making a donation to support our operations. Wikipedia is non-profit and free of advertising. Please consider making a donation. Wikipedia is free for you, but not free for us. Consider a donation to keep our mission strong. Make a donation to Wikipedia and give the gift of knowledge!
A Wikipedia that was influenced by financial donations would have access to far more money than whatever you are claiming you would have donated. Imagine a Wikipedia where the willingness to donate was allowed to control content and discussions.
A person editing with an account is not treated as doing so on behalf of another body or person. (Exceptions are exceedingly rare and require approval.) Examples: Names promoting a business, group, activist stance, or organization; Offensive or disruptive: User names are used to simply identify users uniquely.
If you want to help feel free to donate in any way you can. Thank you. – The Wikimedia Foundation". This takes inspiration mainly from Banner 2 however is much more friendly and also says that monetary donations are not the only kind of donation that can help support the various projects.
Wikimedia Foundation director Katherine Maher has called on commercial organizations to develop Wikipedia and the shared commons to match their use of it. [16] [17] [18]On March 16, 2021, the Wikimedia Foundation announced the launch of Wikimedia Enterprise, a commercial product designed to sell and deliver Wikipedia's content directly to Big Tech companies. [19]
Although in other contexts (like geographical features) I am a big fan of parenthetical disambiguation, I think it only makes sense for personal names when there are truly two persons with exactly the same name (i.e., they do not have middle names or are unknown, or the middle names are also the same).
We're not saying don't use your Imagination. Anything you don't know the title of. Your wiki or blog. It's probably not internationally famous. If it is, well, go ahead, but let's face it; your blog of cute cats is not internationally famous (three readers is not fame). [1] Your new invention or research paper that will change the world.
Adding the name of a non-notable individual to a stand-alone list of alumni is bad for several reasons. It undermines Wikipedia's legitimacy as an encyclopedia. Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking sites provide people a forum to discuss their lives. Wikipedia is meant to provide factual information about notable topics.