Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Whether the speech is sexually vulgar or obscene (Bethel School District v. Fraser). Whether the speech, if allowed as part of a school activity or function, would be contrary to the basic educational mission of the school (Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier). Each of these considerations has given rise to a separate mode of analysis, and in Morse v.
During colonial times, English speech regulations were rather restrictive.The English criminal common law of seditious libel made criticizing the government a crime. Lord Chief Justice John Holt, writing in 1704–1705, explained the rationale for the prohibition: "For it is very necessary for all governments that the people should have a good opinion of it."
Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held, in a 5–3 decision, that student speech in a school-sponsored student newspaper at a public high school could be censored by school officials without a violation of First Amendment rights if the school's actions were "reasonably related" to a ...
Master of Fine Arts: MFA or M.F.A. Master of Liberal Arts: MLS or M.L.S. Master of Library Science: MLS or M.L.S. Master of Music: MM or M.M. Master of Science: MS or M.S. Master of Engineering Management: MEM or MME or MSEM: Master of Business Administration: MBA or M.B.A. Master of Business and Science: MBS: Master of Public Administration ...
Sullivan, [4] government-funded doctors in a government health program were not allowed to advise patients on obtaining abortions, and the doctors challenged this law on Free Speech grounds. [1] However, the Court held that because the program was government-funded, the doctors were, therefore, speaking on behalf of the government.
These programs will be the first master’s degrees in the USC School of Dramatic Arts’ history to go tuition-free. As of last year, tuition and fees for USC's graduate acting and dramatic ...
Without graduate students, the college's undergraduate program would suffer, too. "As the only MFA program in the city, the majority of arts faculty at the Art Academy of Cincinnati are also our ...
[13] The Third Circuit cited Tinker when ruling that the school's ban on the bracelets violated the students' right to free speech because the bracelets were not plainly offensive or disruptive. [14] The court also cited Fraser, saying the bracelets were not lewd speech. [14] The Supreme Court later declined to take up the case. [15]