enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

    United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously ordered President Richard Nixon to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials related to the Watergate scandal to a federal district court.

  3. The Nixon rulings at the centre of Trump’s Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/nixon-rulings-centre-trump-supreme...

    Meanwhile, Mr Smith is using the 1974 Supreme Court case United States v Nixon to argue that he should not be. ... United States v Nixon. The special counsel’s office is citing the second ...

  4. Nixon v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._United_States

    Nixon v. United States , 506 U.S. 224 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that a question of whether the Senate had properly tried an impeachment was political in nature and could not be resolved in the courts if there was no applicable judicial standard.

  5. Nixon v. General Services Administration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._General_Services...

    Nixon v. General Services Administration , 433 U.S 425 (1977), is a landmark court case concerning the principle of presidential privilege and whether the public is allowed to view a President's “confidential documents”. [ 1 ]

  6. Opinion: Jack Smith’s ingenious response to Trump’s immunity ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-trump-immunity-defense...

    In two other landmark precedents dealing with comparable executive powers, United States v. Nixon and Trump v. Thompson , all proceedings were completed in a little over three months in both cases.

  7. Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_State_Pharmacy...

    Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could not limit pharmacists' right to provide information about prescription drug prices. [1] This was an important case in determining the application of the First Amendment to ...

  8. Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Indian_Nation_of...

    The 1974 opinion in this case has already spawned a vast number of Indian land claims. A number of cases are pending throughout the eastern states and southern states, citing the 1974 jurisdictional opinion as if it were an opinion on the merits of the issues. That case, indeed, has already been cited 162 times since 1974. [6] County of Oneida v.

  9. Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Confederated...

    Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463 (1979), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of Washington's imposition of partial jurisdiction over certain actions on an Indian reservation, when not requested by the tribe, was valid under Public Law 280.