enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_States_Energy_Services...

    Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the inter partes review process granted by Congress to the United States Patent and Trademark Office for challenging the validity of patents, rather than a jury trial, is constitutional and did not violate either Article III of the Constitution ...

  3. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1]

  4. International Shoe Co. v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Shoe_Co._v...

    International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a party, particularly a corporation, may be subject to the jurisdiction of a state court if it has "minimum contacts" with that state. [1]

  5. New Revised Standard Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Revised_Standard_Version

    The New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSV-CE) is an edition of the NRSV for Catholics. It contains all the canonical books of Scripture accepted by the Catholic Church arranged in the traditional Catholic order. Because of the presence of Catholic scholars on the original NRSV translation team, no other changes to the text were ...

  6. Federal question jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_question_jurisdiction

    Article III of the United States Constitution permits federal courts to hear such cases, so long as the United States Congress passes a statute to that effect. However, when Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789, which authorized the newly created federal courts to hear such cases, it initially chose not to allow the lower federal courts to possess federal question jurisdiction for fear ...

  7. Case or Controversy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause

    The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III of the United States Constitution (found in Art. III, Section 2, Clause 1) as embodying two distinct limitations on exercise of judicial review: a bar on the issuance of advisory opinions, and a requirement that parties must have standing.

  8. Georgia is turning to backup Gunner Stockton at quarterback ...

    www.aol.com/georgia-turning-backup-gunner...

    Mills had 37 tackles and 7 1/2 sacks this season and anchored the interior line while All-American Howard Cross II missed the final three regular season games with a high ankle sprain. Cross ...

  9. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revlon,_Inc._v._MacAndrews...

    Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), [1] was a landmark decision of the Delaware Supreme Court on hostile takeovers. The Court declared that, in certain limited circumstances indicating that the "sale" or "break-up" of the company is inevitable, the fiduciary obligation of the directors of a target corporation are narrowed significantly, the singular ...