Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Adding the VPM would increase the cost of each submarine by $500 million (2012 prices). [82] This additional cost would be offset by reducing the total submarine force by four boats. [ 83 ] More recent reports state that as a cost reduction measure the VPM would carry only Tomahawk SLCM and possibly unmanned undersea vehicles (UUV) with the new ...
Thus, the total cost to refit the four boats is just under $700 million per vessel. [citation needed] In November 2002, Ohio entered a dry-dock, beginning her 36-month refueling and missile-conversion overhaul. Electric Boat announced on 9 January 2006 that the conversion had been completed.
In 1982, after building 31 boats, the class underwent a minor redesign. The following eight that made up the second "flight" of subs had 12 new vertical launch tubes that could fire Tomahawk missiles. The last 23 had a significant upgrade with the 688i improvement program. These boats are quieter, with more advanced electronics, sensors, and ...
In 2005, India chose the Scorpène design; purchasing six submarines for US$3 billion (US$500 million per boat). Under a technology transfer agreement, the state-owned Mazagon Docks in Mumbai was to manufacture the submarines, and deliver them between 2012 and 2016, however the project is running six years behind schedule.
These changes were in part designed to reduce the cost to build and maintain the submarines. In addition, the United States and Canada provided 80% of funds for scrapping the older Typhoon-class submarines, making it much more economical to build a new submarine. [17] TK-13, which was scrapped in 2007–2009. [18]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Nutrition: (Per One Regular Sub): Calories: 1,110 Fat: 77.33 g (Saturated Fat: 16.93 g) Sodium: 2,468.47 mg Carbs: 59.53 g (Fiber: 4.3 g, Sugar: 8.21 g) Protein: 47.86 g. Considering how lazily ...
Several newspaper articles and commentators have incorrectly claimed that the project ran significantly over the contract cost. [134] As of the launch of the first submarine, the project cost had increased from A$3.892 billion in 1986 dollars to A$4.989 billion in 1993 dollars, which corresponded to the rate of inflation during that period. [135]