Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Leading cases on competition law include Consten & Grundig v Commission and United Brands v Commission. Case C-185/95: Baustahlgewebe v. Commission. In 1989 the European Commission had adopted a determination that 14 producers of welded steel mesh had engaged in unlawful restrictions of competition. [11]
Search. Appearance. ... Finanzamt Köln Altstadt v Schumacker (1995) C-279/93 is an EU law case, ... 38 In the case of a non-resident who receives the major part of ...
The CJEU is the chief judicial authority of the EU and oversees the uniform application and interpretation of European Union law, in co-operation with the national judiciary of the member states. [4] The CJEU also resolves legal disputes between national governments and EU institutions, and may take action against EU institutions on behalf of ...
The ECJ is the senior court of the CJEU, and it consists of 27 judges, one from each member state, and 11 Advocates General. [2] The Advocates General have the same status as the other judges, but they are also responsible for submitting an independent opinion of the case to the judge panel before they make their decision.
The court first ruled on the direct effect of primary legislation in a case that, though technical and tedious, raised a fundamental principle of Union law. In Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen (1963), a Dutch transport firm brought a complaint against Dutch customs for increasing the duty on a product imported from ...
NH appealed to higher courts, ultimately leading to the Corte suprema di cassazione staying proceedings and referring two questions to the CJEU. The questions focused on the interpretation of Directive 2000/78 and concerned the material scope of this instrument, as well as the eligibility of a lawyers’ association to initiate legal action in ...
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that the European Stability Mechanism was lawful. The CJEU sat in full court, a rare occurrence when all judges preside. [ 7 ] The Court found Council Decision 2011/199/EU to be lawful as the decision's proposed "amendment creates no legal basis for the EU to be able to undertake any action ...
Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne is a 2018 case of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that affirmed residency rights in EU countries (that do not recognise same-sex unions), to the spouse of an EU citizen who is exercising their right to freedom of movement and if the marriage was legally performed in an EU member state.