Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court.On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights extend to a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine.
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: 09-115: 2011-05-26 An Arizona law that sanctions employers who hire illegal immigrants is not preempted by federal immigration law. J.D.B. v. North Carolina: 09-11121: 2011-06-16 Age is relevant in Miranda cases. Bullcoming v. New Mexico: 09-10876 [dead link ] 2011-06-23
Case name Citation Date decided Sykes v. United States: 564 U.S. 1: June 9, 2011 Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. 564 U.S. 50: June 9, 2011 DePierre v. United States
images.huffingtonpost.com
Salinas v. Texas (2013) Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center (2013) Chaidez v. United States (2013) Lozman v. Riviera Beach (2013) Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority (2012) Greene v. Fisher (2011) Bullcoming v. New Mexico (2011) United States v. Tinklenberg (2011) Magwood v. Patterson (2010) United States v. O'Brien (2010) Melendez ...
But also in 2023, New Mexico State gave Moccia a five-year contract extension and a $72,000 raise to $351,000 a year in the first year of the new deal, which was scheduled to end in 2028.
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth; Bullcoming v. New Mexico; C. ... State; DePierre v. United States ... United States v. AT&T (2011 suit) United States v. Banki
Jeffrey Epstein, second from left, with his lawyers in Courtroom 11F under Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo at the West Palm Beach County Courthouse, Florida, for his sentencing