enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Euthydemus (dialogue) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthydemus_(dialogue)

    Euthydemus (Greek: Εὐθύδημος, Euthydemes), written c. 384 BC, is a dialogue by Plato which satirizes what Plato presents as the logical fallacies of the Sophists. [1] In it, Socrates describes to his friend Crito a visit he and various youths paid to two brothers, Euthydemus and Dionysodorus, both of whom were prominent Sophists and ...

  3. Sophist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophist

    A sophist (Greek: σοφιστής, romanized: sophistēs) was a teacher in ancient Greece in the fifth and fourth centuries BCE. Sophists specialized in one or more subject areas, such as philosophy, rhetoric, music, athletics and mathematics. They taught arete, "virtue" or "excellence", predominantly to young statesmen and nobility.

  4. Against the Sophists - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_the_Sophists

    Isocrates begins his speech by defining the typical characteristics of most sophist teachers. He makes seven clear accusations about what is wrong with their instructional methods. The first accusation is that sophists make big promises that they cannot fulfill, especially relating to having the ability to teach the virtue and justice.

  5. Thrasymachus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrasymachus

    Demanding payment before speaking, he claims that "justice is the advantage of the stronger" (338c) and that "injustice, if it is on a large enough scale, is stronger, freer, and more masterly than justice'" (344c). Socrates counters by forcing him to admit that there is some standard of wise rule — Thrasymachus does claim to be able to teach ...

  6. Gorgias (dialogue) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgias_(dialogue)

    Socrates posits that the rhetorician should accuse himself first, and then do his family and friends the favour of accusing them, so great is the curative power of justice (480c–e). Socrates maintains that, assuming the converse of the previous argument, if your enemy has done something awful, you should contrive every means to see that he ...

  7. Sophist (dialogue) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophist_(dialogue)

    The Sophist (Greek: Σοφιστής; Latin: Sophista [1]) is a Platonic dialogue from the philosopher's late period, most likely written in 360 BC. In it the interlocutors, led by Eleatic Stranger employ the method of division in order to classify and define the sophist and describe his essential attributes and differentia vis a vis the philosopher and statesman.

  8. Protagoras (dialogue) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protagoras_(dialogue)

    Socrates' move is to pretend that he has a weak memory (334c), and that for the debate to continue, Protagoras needs to answer in a concise manner. This forces the Sophist to use Socrates' notorious method, his unique question/answer format that can lead to a logical conclusion, usually in Socrates' favour. Protagoras begins to bristle at this ...

  9. Socratic method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method

    Socrates (as depicted by Plato) generally applied his method of examination to concepts such as the virtues of piety, wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. Such an examination challenged the implicit moral beliefs of the interlocutors, bringing out inadequacies and inconsistencies in their beliefs, and usually resulting in aporia .