Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2013, Carl Malamud purchased a 186-volume hard copy [4] of the OCGA (at a cost of over $1,000; the cost is just below $400 for Georgia residents) and published the contents on the website Public.Resource.Org.
The case, Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., decided the question: Whether the government edicts doctrine extends to – and thus renders uncopyrightable – works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. [8]
Florida v. Georgia (2018) 1155 Preston v. Ferrer: 1156 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre: 1157 Ex parte Hennen: 1158 United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. 1159 Hodgson v. Minnesota: 1160 McKeiver v. Pennsylvania: 1161 Schad v. Arizona: 1162 Watkins v. United States: 1163 Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15: ...
Public performance of broadcast television: Majority: Stewart Dissent: Blackmun (in part), Douglas : Receiving a television broadcast from a "distant" source does not constitute a "performance" Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken: 422 U.S. 151: 1975: 7–2: Substantive: Public performance of radio broadcasts in business establishments ...
Public interest groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), [44] Public Knowledge, [45] and the Authors Alliance [46] have opposed the bill, claiming that the CASE Act is still not enough to appropriately protect individuals from "sophisticated actors" (corporations, copyright "trolls" and similar abusers).
Georgia Constitutional Convention of 1861; Georgia Land Lotteries; Georgia resolutions 1827; Georgia v. Brailsford (1792) Georgia v. Brailsford (1793) Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. Georgia v. Stanton; Gregg v. Georgia
Public.Resource.Org (PRO) [2] is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation dedicated to publishing and sharing public domain materials in the United States and internationally. It was founded by Carl Malamud and is based in Sebastopol, California .
A number of library and public interest associations weighed in supporting the position of Public.Resource.Org. [7] These organizations include American Association of Law Libraries, [8] [9] Electronic Frontier Foundation, [10] [11] Library Futures, [12] Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, [13] and Public Citizen. [14]