Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Abortion rights advocates and Democratic lawmakers expressed relief at the decision, but also concern that the Supreme Court had entertained the case in the first place. "I have both relief and ...
Mifepristone ruling referenced another important abortion case. Thursday's U.S. Supreme Court ruling on access to mifepristone referenced another important abortion case the court is considering ...
In a landmark 2022 decision, the Supreme Court has also limited the EPA’s authority to combat climate change and water pollution. 💊 Rejection of opioid settlement. Case: Harrington v. Purdue ...
The Supreme Court confirmed the draft's authenticity the next day; at the same time, the Supreme Court's press release said that "it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case". [105] [106] [107] In response to the leak, Roberts said, "The work of the Court will not be affected in ...
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016), was a landmark decision [1] of the US Supreme Court announced on June 27, 2016. The Court ruled 5–3 that Texas cannot place restrictions on the delivery of abortion services that create an undue burden for women seeking an abortion.
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, 595 U.S. 30 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case brought by Texas abortion providers and abortion rights advocates that challenged the constitutionality of the Texas Heartbeat Act, a law that outlaws abortions after six weeks. [1]
The US Supreme Court has preserved access to a widely used abortion drug while legal challenges against mifepristone’s government approval continue, marking the court’s first major decision on ...
The justices took up the administration's appeal of an August decision by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that would curb how the pill, called mi US Supreme Court to decide ...