Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
UPDATED: The U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has formally opened an investigation into Ticketmaster’s compliance with consumer protection law in relation to the sale of Oasis ...
Long the subject of consumer complaints, angst toward the two companies reached a crescendo in 2022 when Bruce Springsteen fans were confronted with so-called “dynamic pricing” that saw face ...
In May 2013, Ticketmaster agreed to pay up to $23 million for enrolling customers into a rewards program that charged $9 per month. Ticketmaster made $85 million in fees, from customers who took about eight months on average to cancel their enrollment in the program. 1.12 million customers were eligible to claim up to a $30 refund. [62]
Dynamic pricing is when ticket prices are increased on primary selling sites – such as Ticketmaster – based on demand. In the case of the recent Oasis ticket sales, customers queued for hours ...
Ticketmaster was the subject of several controversies, such as anti-competition claims, deceitful relationships with scalpers, data breach, deceptive pricing, and dynamic pricing. [13] According to consumer organizations, Ticketmaster and Live Nation control over 70% of the primary ticketing and live event venues market. [14]
The California lawsuit, which was filed in 2003 and recently granted national class-action status, challenges Ticketmaster's "Order Processing Fee" and the fee it charges customers who opt for UPS ...
The Justice Department sued Ticketmaster and its parent company Thursday, accusing them of running an illegal monopoly over live events in America and asking a court to break up the system that ...
According to the lawsuit filed in New York by the US government and 30 attorneys general from both political parties, Live Nation has monopolized the live events market by owning key chunks of ...