Ads
related to: haydock douay-rheims biblemardel.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
christianbook.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Easy online order; very reasonable; lots of product variety - BizRate
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
George Leo Haydock (1774–1849) was a priest, pastor and Bible scholar from an ancient English Catholic Recusant family. His edition of the Douay Bible with extended commentary, originally published in 1811, became the most popular English Catholic Bible of the 19th century on both sides of the Atlantic.
The Douay–Rheims Bible (/ ˌ d uː eɪ ˈ r iː m z, ˌ d aʊ eɪ-/, [1] US also / d uː ˌ eɪ-/), also known as the Douay–Rheims Version, Rheims–Douai Bible or Douai Bible, and abbreviated as D–R, DRB, and DRV, is a translation of the Bible from the Latin Vulgate into English made by members of the English College, Douai, in the service of the Catholic Church. [2]
The Doway or Douay Bible (Douay-Rheims Bible) was the standard translation for English speaking Catholics. It was originally translated from the Latin Vulgate in the 16th century chiefly by Gregory Martin , one of the first professors at the English Catholic College affiliated to the university of Douai .
Haydock's Catholic Bible Commentary, 1859 edition. by George Leo Haydock, following the Douay-Rheims Bible. A Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture 1953 edited by Bernard Orchard, Edmund F. Sutcliffe, Reginald C. Fuller, Ralph Russell, foreword by Cardinal Bernard Griffin, Archbishop of Westminster
New Testament title page of the 1582 Douay–Rheims Bible. The Douai (or Douay) version was the work of English Roman Catholic scholars connected with the University of Douai in France. The New Testament was issued at Rheims in 1582, and the Old Testament in two volumes, in 1609 and 1610, just before the King James version.
The 1738 Challoner revision of the Douay Rheims Bible and the Haydock Biblical Commentary specifically declare that "Nabuchodonosor" was "known as 'Saosduchin' to profane historians and succeeded 'Asarhaddan' in the kingdom of the Assyrians". This could only have been Ashurbanipal, as he was the successor of Esarhaddon, his father.