enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. These Expert-Recommended Fireproof Safes Will Keep Your ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/expert-recommended-fireproof-safes...

   In addition to a half-hour UL-certified fireproof protection (at 1550 F), the ETL waterproof rating ensures the safe can be submerged for up to 72 hours without compromising the contents.

3. Gun safe - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_safe

   Fireproof gun safes have an UL classification, and depending on the build of the gun safe, the inside must not get warmer than a certain temperature during a certain period of time. A common rating for gun safes is "350-1 hour" or "350-2 hour", which means that when the safe is in a fire, the inside will not get warmer than 350 degrees ...

4. Safe - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe

   A fire-resistant safe is a type of safe that is designed to protect its contents from high temperatures or actual fire. Fire resistant safes are usually rated by the amount of time they can withstand the extreme temperatures a fire produces, while not exceeding a set internal temperature, e.g., less than 350 °F (177 °C).

5. Sentry Group - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentry_Group

   SentrySafe is a brand of safes manufactured in Rochester, New York. It is owned by the Master Lock Company. [1] It markets safes designed for home, business, and gun storage. In addition to security, SentrySafe includes a range of Underwriters Laboratories (UL)-rated safes to protect valuables from both fire and water.

6. 120,000 gun safes recalled as U.S. warns children were able ...

   www.aol.com/news/120-000-gun-safes-recalled...

   The Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled biometric gun safes made by Bulldog Cases, Awesafe, Machir and MouTec after children were able to open them. 120,000 gun safes recalled as U.S ...

7. Liberty Safe - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Safe

   On August 30, 2023, Liberty Safe faced backlash over backdoor access provided to law enforcement agencies, including the FBI. [18] The controversy arose when it was revealed that the company had granted access codes to the FBI upon receiving valid warrants to search the property of an Arkansas resident involved in the January 6 United States Capitol attack. [19]