Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The inspector returned twice more, again without a search warrant, and was again denied entry. A complaint was subsequently filed against the tenant, and he was arrested for violating a city code. He filed suit under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The California district court of appeal, relying on the previous case of Frank v.
Lawsuit Subject of lawsuit Court of decision Year of decision AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion: contracts that exclude class action arbitration: Supreme Court of the United States: 2011 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit: SLUSA preempting state law class action claims: Supreme Court of the United States: 2006 West v. Randall
In addition, any consumer could act as a representative and file a class action lawsuit against a business committing unfair competition. [15] Proposition 64 allows only private plaintiffs who have "suffered injury in fact and lost money or property as a result of such unfair competition" may file suit, [ 16 ] while "unaffected" plaintiffs now ...
Indian Beach resident Tom Frascone has been battling the city of Sarasota for the last 6 months over code violations in the construction of his neighbor's house.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Supreme Court of California is the highest and final court of appeals in the courts of the U.S. state of California. It is headquartered in San Francisco at the Earl Warren Building, [1] but it regularly holds sessions in Los Angeles and Sacramento. [2] Its decisions are binding on all other California state courts. [3]
Orange County, which is home to more than 3 million people between Los Angeles and San Diego, filed a pair of lawsuits against Southern California Edison in which it alleges the company's ...
The lawsuit was settled without money changing hands and without changes in school policies. [15] Perry v. Schwarzenegger. ADF represented Proposition 8 proponents ProtectMarriage.com in the Federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the proposition, which limited marriage in California to one man and one woman. [16]