Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A jury has reached a verdict in the trial of Richard Allen, who is accused of killing two teenage girls and leaving their bodies near a hiking path in Delphi, Indiana, in 2017, according to CNN ...
The verdict is an affirmation of the years-long and, at times, criticized law enforcement investigation of the girls’ deaths. ... Allen is on trial in Delphi, Indiana, on murder charges in the ...
A 52-year-old man who prosecutors said was “hiding in plain sight” was found guilty on Monday of the brutal murders of two girls in the small town of Delphi, Indiana, more than seven years ago.
This list of U.S. states by Alford plea usage documents usage of the form of guilty plea known as the Alford plea in each of the U.S. states in the United States. An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine [4] [5] [6]) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and ...
A murder trial begins in a small Indiana town in the killings of two teenage girls; Biden administration races to shell out billions for clean energy as election nears; Texas Supreme Court halts execution of man in shaken baby case after lawmakers' last-minute appeal; Alabama executes man who killed 5 and asked to be put to death
Delphi, Indiana, resident Richard Allen was found guilty on all charges on Monday in the double murders of best friends Abby Williams, 13, and Libby German, 14. The jury's verdict came on the ...
The following constitutes murder with aggravating circumstances, which is the only capital crime in Indiana. [8]The defendant committed the murder by intentionally killing the victim while committing or attempting to commit any of the following: arson, burglary, child molesting, criminal deviate conduct, kidnapping, rape, robbery, carjacking, criminal organization activity, dealing in cocaine ...
The Court had recognized these two rights on competency for some time. In Dusky v.United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), and in Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975), the Court established the standard for competency to stand trial—the defendant must have a "rational and factual understanding" of the nature of the proceedings, and must be able to rationally assist his lawyer in defending him.