enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  3. Dollree Mapp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollree_Mapp

    Dollree Mapp (October 30, 1923 – October 31, 2014) was the appellant in the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio (1961). She argued that her right to privacy in her home, the Fourth Amendment, was violated by police officers who entered her house with what she thought to be a fake search warrant. [1]

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    (Overruled by Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952)) Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) Expressions in which the circumstances are intended to result in crime that poses a clear and present danger of succeeding can be punished without violating the First Amendment. (Overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)) Abrams v.

  5. Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

    It was not until Mapp v. Ohio [18] in 1961 that the exclusionary rule was also held to be binding on the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees due process. Up until Mapp, the exclusionary rule had been rejected by most states. [19] In 2016, Utah v.

  6. Good-faith exception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good-faith_exception

    Ohio that the exclusionary rule also applies to state criminal prosecutions under the doctrine of incorporation. In Mapp , the majority gave three rationales for enforcing the exclusionary rule under the Constitution: protecting a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights, promoting judicial integrity, and deterring improper searches and seizures.

  7. Supreme Court of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Ohio

    State (1997) the Supreme Court of Ohio found that Ohio's method of funding its schools was unconstitutional. The case originated in the Perry County Schools. In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Supreme Court of Ohio, and found that evidence seized unlawfully without a search warrant cannot be used in criminal prosecutions.

  8. 5 2025 Medicare Changes Every Retiree Should Know - AOL

    www.aol.com/5-2025-medicare-changes-every...

    Image source: Getty Images. 1. Cost increases for Parts A and B. Original Medicare's premiums and deductibles went up in 2025. The Part A annual deductible increased from $1,632 to $1,676, and the ...

  9. Aguilar–Spinelli test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aguilar–Spinelli_test

    It was not until Mapp v. Ohio , 367 U.S. 643 (1961), [ 3 ] that the exclusionary rule was held to be binding on the states through the doctrine of selective incorporation.) Subsequently, the defense in many criminal trials attempted to prove that a search warrant was invalid, thus making the search illegal and hence the evidence obtained ...