enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. CVS hit with lawsuit, accused of unlawfully filling opioid ...

    www.aol.com/cvs-hit-lawsuit-accused-unlawfully...

    PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against CVS Health, accusing the drugstore giant of filling prescriptions for controlled substances that “lacked a ...

  3. US accuses Walgreens of filling unlawful opioid prescriptions

    www.aol.com/us-accuses-walgreens-filling...

    The U.S. Justice Department on Friday accused pharmacy chain operator Walgreens Boots Alliance of contributing to the U.S. opioid epidemic by filling millions of unlawful prescriptions for ...

  4. DOJ sues CVS for allegedly filling illegal prescriptions ...

    www.aol.com/doj-sues-cvs-allegedly-filling...

    According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, CVS also allegedly filled large quantities of prescriptions for controlled substances written by prescribers it knew participated in "pill mill practices."

  5. Race and the war on drugs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_the_war_on_drugs

    It placed all controlled substances into one of five scheduled classes based on their potential for abuse and ability to be used in medical treatment. [16] One feature of the Act was the establishment of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, also known as the Shafer Commission , which was chaired by former Pennsylvania Governor ...

  6. McFadden v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McFadden_v._United_States

    McFadden v. United States, 576 U.S. 186 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that section 841 of the Controlled Substances Act requires the government to prove that to be in criminal violation, a defendant must be aware that an analogue defined by the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act with which he was dealing was a controlled substance.

  7. Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Safe_Access...

    Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration was a case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the DEA's denial of a petition by plaintiff Americans for Safe Access for removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act survives review under the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard.

  8. California's fentanyl fight: Politicians v. grieving parents

    www.aol.com/californias-fentanyl-fight...

    One of the hardest-fought political battles in 2024 happened inside California's Capitol between a group of grieving parents who lost their kids to fentanyl and a handful of powerful politicians ...

  9. Gonzales v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Oregon

    Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law, to terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives, commonly referred to as assisted suicide. [1]

  1. Related searches areas of conflict in news stories related to the controlled substances act

    the controlled substances actthe war on drugs