enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Titles_of_works

    Titles in quotation marks that include (or in unusual cases consist of) something that requires italicization for some other reason than being a title, e.g. a genus and species name, or a non-English phrase, or the name of a larger work being referred to, also use the needed italicization, inside the quotation marks: "Ferromagnetic Material in ...

  3. Template:Cite thesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_thesis

    A Citation Style 1 template used to create citations for theses or dissertations submitted to and approved by an educational institution recognized as capable of awarding higher degrees. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template has custom formatting. Parameter Description Type Status Surname of author last last1 surname surname1 author author1 Surname of author. Do not wikilink ...

  4. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    For titles of books, articles, poems, and so forth, use italics or quotation marks following the guidance for titles. Italics can also be added to mark up non-English terms (with the {} template), for an organism's scientific name, and to indicate a words-as-words usage.

  5. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Text formatting

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Exclamation points (!) should usually only be used in direct quotes and titles of creative works. Bold type is reserved for certain uses. Quotation marks for emphasis of a single word or phrase are incorrect, and "scare quotes" are discouraged. Quotation marks are to show that you are using the correct word as quoted from the original source.

  6. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 2

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Titles_of_works/Archive_2

    In my opinion, it is neater and cleaner looking to use emphasis – whether italics or bold (but not both, as in the Halo example above) – for titles, and reserve quotation marks for, ahem, quotations! – that is, for reporting direct speech. Therefore I would prefer to see the bullet point quoted above changed to read, say:

  7. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Text formatting/Archive 7

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    Those titles should be in italics; #1 is correct. How to deal with a major work in the title of another major work is less clear; I've seen single quotation marks and partly unitalicised solutions: "Last, First (year). Commentary on Shakespeare's 'Othello '." and "Last, First (year). Commentary on Shakespeare's Othello." and of course ...

  8. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Titles_of_works/Archive_1

    Often, works are known by a nickname or common title. In this case, the nickname is specified after the formal title in parentheses and quotation marks. When the nickname is used in prose, it is enclosed in quotes. Song titles are enclosed in quotes. True titles of song cycles are italicized. Foreign language song titles remain in roman type.

  9. Emphasis (typography) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emphasis_(typography)

    Roman emphasis example Different methods of emphasis. The most common methods in Western typography fall under the general technique of emphasis through a change or modification of font: italics, boldface and SMALL CAPS. Other methods include the alteration of LETTER CASE and spacing as well as color and *additional graphic marks*.