Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Madhava's correction term is a mathematical expression attributed to Madhava of Sangamagrama (c. 1340 – c. 1425), the founder of the Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics, that can be used to give a better approximation to the value of the mathematical constant π (pi) than the partial sum approximation obtained by truncating the Madhava–Leibniz infinite series for π.
where C is the circumference of a circle, d is the diameter, and r is the radius.More generally, = where L and w are, respectively, the perimeter and the width of any curve of constant width.
The successor function is denoted by S, so S(n) = n + 1. For example, S(1) = 2 and S(2) = 3. The successor function is one of the basic components used to build a primitive recursive function. Successor operations are also known as zeration in the context of a zeroth hyperoperation: H 0 (a, b) = 1 + b.
They are also known as the recursive numbers, [1] effective numbers, [2] computable reals, [3] or recursive reals. [4] The concept of a computable real number was introduced by Émile Borel in 1912, using the intuitive notion of computability available at the time.
For example, addition and division, the factorial and exponential function, and the function which returns the nth prime are all primitive recursive. [1] In fact, for showing that a computable function is primitive recursive, it suffices to show that its time complexity is bounded above by a primitive recursive function of the input size. [2]
In the case of a perfect binary tree of height h, there are 2 h+1 −1 nodes and 2 h+1 Null pointers as children (2 for each of the 2 h leaves), so short-circuiting cuts the number of function calls in half in the worst case. In C, the standard recursive algorithm may be implemented as:
If the function is total, it is also called a total recursive function (sometimes shortened to recursive function). [1] In computability theory , it is shown that the μ-recursive functions are precisely the functions that can be computed by Turing machines [ 2 ] [ 4 ] (this is one of the theorems that supports the Church–Turing thesis ).
The total time is 1.1191 + 0.8672 = 1.9863 The conclusion, based on this particular model, is that equation 6 is slightly faster than equation 5, regardless of the fact that equation 6 has more terms. This result is typical of the general trend.