Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a type of informal fallacy where adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing something that the target person is about to say. Poisoning the well can be a special case of argumentum ad hominem, and the term ...
Well poisoning is the act of malicious manipulation of potable water resources in order to cause illness or death, or to deny an opponent access to fresh water ...
This fallacy relies on the implied expertise of the speaker or on an unstated truism. [94] [95] [96] Bulverism (psychogenetic fallacy) – inferring why an argument is being used, associating it to some psychological reason, then assuming it is invalid as a result. The assumption that if the origin of an idea comes from a biased mind, then the ...
Tu quoque (/ tjuːˈkwoʊkwiː /; [ 1 ] Latin for 'you also') is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical. This specious reasoning is a special type of ad hominem attack.
Poisoning the well – Type of informal fallacy; Political correctness – Measures to avoid offense or disadvantage; Incitement to ethnic or racial hatred – Criminal offence in several countries; Shibboleth – Custom or tradition that distinguishes one group from another
A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument [ 1 ][ 2 ] that may appear to be well-reasoned if unnoticed. The term was introduced in the Western intellectual tradition by the Aristotelian De Sophisticis Elenchis.
In everyday reasoning, the fallacy of four terms occurs most frequently by equivocation: using the same word or phrase but with a different meaning each time, creating a fourth term even though only three distinct words are used. The resulting argument sounds like the (valid) first example above, but is in fact structured like the invalid ...
There the well-poisoning is actually done by decades of media-bombardment and "education" relating to the issue. All Holocaust proponents got to do is insinuate or implicate something. A variety is the ad hominem argument that those questioning the proponents must be "Nazis", hence have "sympathies" for the devil. -- 41.151.208.221 ( talk ) 21: ...