Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(2) Protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of personal information; (3) Protect against unauthorized access to and acquisition of personal information that is likely to result in a material risk of identity theft or other fraud to the individual to whom the information relates.
Objective expectation of privacy: legitimate and generally recognized by society and perhaps protected by law. Places where individuals expect privacy include residences, hotel rooms, [ 1 ] or public places that have been provided by businesses or the public sector to ensure privacy, including public restrooms, private portions of jailhouses ...
Such sources may require anonymity to protect them from physical, economic or professional reprisals in response to their revelations. There is a strong tradition of legal source protection internationally, in recognition of the function that confidential sources play in facilitating ' watchdog ' or 'accountability' journalism.
A shield law is a law that gives reporters protection against being forced to disclose confidential information or sources in state court. There is no federal shield law and state shield laws vary in scope. In general, however, a shield law aims to provide the protection of: "a reporter cannot be forced to reveal his or her source".
How anonymity became a hot-button debate in Diddy lawsuits and beyond. For lesser-known defendants, anonymity can still prove important, the plaintiff side argues, given the public shame that can ...
They then clarify their goals: "It is our purpose to consider whether the existing law affords a principle which can properly be invoked to protect the privacy of the individual; and, if it does, what the nature and extent of such protection is". [8] Warren and Brandeis write that privacy rights should protect both businesses and private ...
The First Amendment states the government cannot violate the individual's right to " freedom of speech, or of the press". [3] In the past, this amendment primarily served as a legal justification for infringement on an individual's right to privacy; as a result, the government was unable to clearly outline a protective scope of the right to speech versus the right to privacy.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!