enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ker v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ker_v._California

    Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963), was a case before the United States Supreme Court, which incorporated the Fourth Amendment's protections against illegal search and seizure. The case was decided on June 10, 1963, by a vote of 5–4.

  3. California v. Ciraolo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Ciraolo

    California v. Ciraolo , 476 U.S. 207 (1986), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that aerial observation of a person's backyard by police, even if done without a search warrant , does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  4. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [2] [3]

  5. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    "The plaintiffs have alleged that the seizures at issue, though lawful at their inception, later came to unreasonably interfere with their protected possessory interests in their own property ...

  6. Horton v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horton_v._California

    Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless seizure of evidence which is in plain view. The discovery of the evidence does not have to be inadvertent, although that is a characteristic of most legitimate plain-view seizures.

  7. California has a history of racist land seizures. Will ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/california-history-racist-land...

    Bradford believes that hundreds and perhaps thousands of other California property owners, or their descendants, may seek financial remedies under the proposed law. "I can't assign a dollar figure ...

  8. Searches incident to a lawful arrest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_incident_to_a...

    Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

  9. California girl, 11, wins $300K settlement from police who ...

    www.aol.com/california-girl-11-wins-300k...

    A California girl was awarded $300,000 in a settlement with police who went out of their way to seize and butcher her beloved pet goat, according to reports.. Jessica Long’s daughter — who was ...

  1. Related searches illegal seizure of personal property examples in california pdf free software

    property seizure after arrestcan police seize property permanently