enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    In R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92 the Court of Appeal ruled that the defendant, who wounded a woman by hitting her with a video recorder while sleepwalking, was insane under the M'Naghten Rules. Lord Lane said, "We accept that sleep is a normal condition, but the evidence in the instant case indicates that sleepwalking, and particularly violence in ...

  3. Daniel M'Naghten - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_M'Naghten

    There is disagreement over how M'Naghten's name should be spelt (Mc or M' at the beginning, au or a in the middle, a, e, o or u at the end). M'Naghten is favoured in both English and American law reports, although the original trial report used M'Naughton; Bethlem and Broadmoor records use McNaughton and McNaughten. [2]

  4. Plea colloquy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_colloquy

    The defendant's rights to not plead guilty, and to request a jury trial. The court must ask the defendant if he understands each of these points, and must receive a voluntary affirmative response. Many courts use a script of the questions which the judge will ask the defendant and the defense attorney in a specific order. Failure by the court ...

  5. Talk:M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M'Naghten_rules

    The prosecution has the burden of proof, because they have to prove that the defendant actually killed someone. The defendant can both attack the prosuection case (by, for example, showing that he didn't kill someone) AND raise his two "defences", of (a) insanity; and (b) self-defence. But the defendant has to prove his defences, not the ...

  6. The husband-wife legal team working on two of today’s ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/husband-wife-legal-team-working...

    A graduate of Connecticut College and Brooklyn Law School, he worked at the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and as a Manhattan assistant district attorney before turning to ...

  7. Tanner v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_v._United_States

    Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Meatpacking giants to pay $8 million for child labor violations

    www.aol.com/meatpacking-giants-pay-8-million...

    Two multibillion-dollar meatpacking companies will each pay $4 million after federal investigations revealed they had illicitly employed dozens of children through staffing agencies, the Labor ...