enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  3. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Inter_Tribal...

    Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013), is a 2012-term United States Supreme Court case revolving around Arizona's unique voter registration requirements, including the necessity of providing documentary proof of citizenship. In a 7–2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Arizona's registration requirements were unlawful ...

  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene...

    Carolene Products is best known for its Footnote Four, which is considered to be "the most famous footnote in constitutional law." [1] [2] Although the Court had applied minimal scrutiny (rational basis review) to the economic regulation in this case, Footnote Four reserved for other types of cases other, stricter standards of review.

  5. United States v. Lopez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Lopez

    Lopez, was a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court that struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (GFSZA) as it was outside of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. It was the first case since 1937 in which the Court held that Congress had exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause.

  6. NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Mackay_Radio...

    NLRB, [68] the Supreme Court held that proof of motive was indeed required. However, no proof of motive was needed where employer conduct "inherently" encouraged or discouraged union membership. A second issue involved use of the whipsaw strike. As unionization in an industry spread, unions encouraged employers to bargain as a group.

  7. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    The denial by the Supreme Court did not include a vote count, but Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the solitary opinion on the case, agreeing that denial was appropriate per New York Times Co., but stating that he believed that decision of New York Times Co. was made wrongly. Thomas wrote "If the Constitution does not require public figures to ...

  8. Braunfeld v. Brown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braunfeld_v._Brown

    Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), was a landmark case on the issue of religious and economic liberty decided by the United States Supreme Court.In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that a Pennsylvania blue law forbidding the sale of various retail products on Sunday was not an unconstitutional interference with religion as described in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  9. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Warren held that "legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests." In his dissenting opinion, Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan II argued that the Equal Protection Clause was not designed to apply to voting rights. The decision had a major impact on state ...