enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 1964 California Proposition 14 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_California_Proposition_14

    California Proposition 14 was a November 1964 initiative ballot measure that amended the California state constitution to nullify the 1963 Rumford Fair Housing Act, thereby allowing property sellers, landlords and their agents to openly discriminate on ethnic grounds when selling or letting accommodations, as they had been permitted to before ...

  3. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co.

    Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of ...

  4. Meyer v. Holley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_v._Holley

    Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280 (2003), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fair Housing Act imposes strict liability on residential real estate corporations for racial discrimination, but the officers and owners of the corporation generally will not be held vicariously liable for offenses committed by the corporation's employees of agents. [1]

  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_of_Arlington...

    U.S. Const. Amend. XIV. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp, 429 U.S. 252 (1977), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with a zoning ordinance that in a practical way barred families of various socio-economic, and ethno-racial backgrounds from residing in a neighborhood.

  6. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.

  7. Judge orders VA to build more housing for homeless veterans ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-orders-va-build-more...

    LOS ANGELES — The VA must build more than 2,500 units of housing for homeless veterans on its sprawling campus in west Los Angeles, a federal judge ruled Friday.. U.S. District Judge David O ...

  8. Man pleads not guilty in the torture, killing of a Los ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/man-arrested-killing-los-angeles...

    A Minnesota man who was charged in connection with the gruesome killing of a woman who worked as a model and real estate agent in California pleaded not guilty during a court hearing Thursday.

  9. California Racial Justice Act of 2020 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Racial_Justice...

    The California Racial Justice Act of 2020 (AB 2542) bars the state from seeking or securing a criminal conviction or imposing a sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity or national origin. The Act, in part, allows a person to challenge their criminal case if there are statistical disparities in how people of different races are either charged ...