Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Recency bias is a cognitive bias that favors recent events over historic ones; a memory bias.Recency bias gives "greater importance to the most recent event", [1] such as the final lawyer's closing argument a jury hears before being dismissed to deliberate.
A aggravate – Some have argued that this word should not be used in the sense of "to annoy" or "to oppress", but only to mean "to make worse". According to AHDI, the use of "aggravate" as "annoy" occurs in English as far back as the 17th century. In Latin, from which the word was borrowed, both meanings were used. Sixty-eight percent of AHD4's usage panel approves of its use in "It's the ...
You are not doing your ideas any favours by giving it a name which is a neologism. Recentness might be preferable as it was first recorded in 1677 according to the OED. Sorry about that quibble. On the subject in hand—the tendency for people to concentrate on all things recent—this is I think mostly unavoidable and not altogether undesirable.
For example, articles routinely cover the deaths of notable individuals, major natural disasters, outbreaks of war, election results, etc. Just as editors should not devote too much weight to event due to recentness, nor should they devote too little coverage to notable, verifiable events due to recentness either.
A synonym is a word, morpheme, or phrase that means precisely or nearly the same as another word, morpheme, or phrase in a given language. [2] For example, in the English language, the words begin, start, commence, and initiate are all synonyms of one another: they are synonymous. The standard test for synonymy is substitution: one form can be ...
Cognitive synonymy is a type of synonymy in which synonyms are so similar in meaning that they cannot be differentiated either denotatively or connotatively, that is, not even by mental associations, connotations, emotive responses, and poetic value.
Irregardless is a word sometimes used in place of regardless or irrespective, which has caused controversy since the early twentieth century, though the word appeared in print as early as 1795. [1]
Neologisms are often formed by combining existing words (see compound noun and adjective) or by giving words new and unique suffixes or prefixes. [9] Neologisms can also be formed by blending words, for example, "brunch" is a blend of the words "breakfast" and "lunch", or through abbreviation or acronym, by intentionally rhyming with existing words or simply through playing with sounds.