enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Service of process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_process

    In the U.S. legal system, service of process is the procedure by which a party to a lawsuit gives an appropriate notice of initial legal action to another party (such as a defendant), court, or administrative body in an effort to exercise jurisdiction over that person so as to force that person to respond to the proceeding in a court, body, or other tribunal.

  3. Compulsory Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_Process_Clause

    Illinois (1988), the Court rejected a challenge to witness preclusion rules, holding that the Clause did not provide for an "absolute" right for defendants. [13] The Court held that "The Compulsory Process Clause provides [the defendant] with an effective weapon, but it is a weapon that cannot be used irresponsibly". [ 14 ]

  4. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Brick_Co._v._Illinois

    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...

  5. Scott v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_v._Illinois

    Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. In Scott, the Court decided whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments required Illinois to provide Scott with trial counsel. To emphasize the importance of court-appointed counsel, the Court opined, "[T]he interest protected by the right to ...

  6. Illinois v. Allen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Allen

    Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 (1970), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the removal of an unruly criminal defendant during his trial. In its decision, the court ruled that a trial judge may remove a stubbornly defiant defendant from the courtroom, following a warning from the judge that he will be removed if his disruptive behavior continues.

  7. Default judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_judgment

    The documents were not served correctly. The defendant has to show that the documents were not served, which would explain why the claimant had ability to enter judgment. This has to be done by way of an "application on notice" (motion). Evidence has to be shown to the procedural judge. This used to be called setting aside an "irregular judgment".

  8. Summons - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summons

    A civil summons is most often accompanied by a complaint. Depending on the type of summons, there is often an option to endorse a summons so that the entity being served may be identified. In the court system in California, for civil unlimited cases in the superior court, a summons will often have these options to endorse: as an individual;

  9. Kirby v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirby_v._Illinois

    Defendants convicted, Cook County, Illinois Circuit Court; affirmed, Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, 121 Ill. App. 2d 323 (1971); cert. granted, 402 U.S. 995 (1971). Holding Pre-indictment showup without counsel was not a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel because the criminal prosecution had not yet begun.