enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of functional programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_functional...

    Common Lisp: No [1] Simulated with thunks [2] Dynamic [3] Yes [4] Extension [5] No [6]? Yes: 1984 Scheme: No [7] Yes [8] Dynamic [7] Yes [9] Simulated with thunks [10] No [11] No: Yes: 1975 Racket: No: Default in Lazy Racket [12] Dynamic by default, gradual with Typed Racket [13] Yes [14] Yes, with Algebraic Racket [15] Partial [16] No: Yes ...

  3. Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    1976 – Evaluation of ALGOL 68, JOVIAL J3B, Pascal, Simula 67, and TACPOL Versus TINMAN – Requirements for a Common High Order Programming Language. 1977 – A comparison of PASCAL and ALGOL 68 [58] – Andrew S. Tanenbaum – June 1977.

  4. Racket (programming language) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language)

    The Racket language is a modern dialect of Lisp and a descendant of Scheme. It is designed as a platform for programming language design and implementation. [9] In addition to the core Racket language, Racket is also used to refer to the family of programming languages [10] and set of tools supporting development on and with Racket. [11]

  5. List of Lisp-family programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Lisp-family...

    Mostly based on Scheme and Common Lisp, was designed as system and application programming language by Apple; first used to write an operating system and applications for internal prototypes of the later released Apple Newton computer; first official version of Apple Dylan also had s-expression based syntax; Apple collaborated with partners to ...

  6. Common Lisp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp

    Common Lisp implementations may use any mix of native code compilation, byte code compilation or interpretation. Common Lisp has been designed to support incremental compilers, file compilers and block compilers. Standard declarations to optimize compilation (such as function inlining or type specialization) are proposed in the language ...

  7. Comparison of integrated development environments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated...

    Has a plotting pane. Juno team merged with VS Code extension team (see below); Juno now in maintenance mode. Emacs / spacemacs: portions in GPL v2, LGPL, BSD and public domain: Yes Yes Yes FreeBSD: Yes Yes ESS extension support for emacs. vi support also available, e.g. in spacemacs (useful for pair programming). Visual Studio Code (using the ...

  8. Common Lisp Object System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System

    The Common Lisp Object System (CLOS) is the facility for object-oriented programming in ANSI Common Lisp. CLOS is a powerful dynamic object system which differs radically from the OOP facilities found in more static languages such as C++ or Java. CLOS was inspired by earlier Lisp object systems such as MIT Flavors and CommonLoops, although it ...

  9. Lisp (programming language) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)

    In the Common Lisp dialect, destructive functions are commonplace; the equivalent of set-car! is named rplaca for "replace car". This function is rarely seen, however, as Common Lisp includes a special facility, setf, to make it easier to define and use destructive functions. A frequent style in Common Lisp is to write code functionally ...