enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Durham v. United States (1954) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_v._United_States_(1954)

    Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), [1] is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity: "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect."

  3. Durham rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_rule

    A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1870) and Durham v. United States (1954).

  4. Timeline of disability rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_disability...

    1954 – Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity, that "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect". [4]

  5. Durham v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_v._United_States

    Printable version; In other projects ... Durham v. United States can refer to: Durham v. United States (1971) Durham v. United States (1954) This page was last edited ...

  6. 105 True or False Questions—Fun Facts To Keep You ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/105-true-false-questions...

    Grasshoppers are mainly eaten in the United States. Answer: False – they’re eaten mostly in Mexico and parts of Central America. 39. Grilled cheese is the most popular sandwich in the United ...

  7. David L. Bazelon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_L._Bazelon

    United States (which adopted a new criminal insanity test) set off a long clash between the two judges, because Burger strongly opposed the new test. [19] Under Bazelon's Durham rule, a defendant would be excused from criminal responsibility if a jury found that the unlawful act was "the product of mental disease or mental defect," rather than ...

  8. Durham refused to pay judgment against officer. Why the city ...

    www.aol.com/news/durham-refused-pay-judgment...

    The city of Durham paid retired police Capt. Darrell Dowdy $350,000 to settle a lawsuit that accused city officials of abandoning him after losing a lawsuit linked to wrongful murder convictions.

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!