Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Given a structure or interpretation, a sentence will have a fixed truth value. A theory is satisfiable when it is possible to present an interpretation in which all of its sentences are true. The study of algorithms to automatically discover interpretations of theories that render all sentences as being true is known as the satisfiability ...
This is a method for producing complete theories through the semantic route, with examples including the set of true sentences under the structure (N, +, ×, 0, 1, =), where N is the set of natural numbers, and the set of true sentences under the structure (R, +, ×, 0, 1, =), where R is the set of real numbers.
In this example, both sentences happen to have the common form () for some individual , in the first sentence the value of the variable x is "Socrates", and in the second sentence it is "Plato". Due to the ability to speak about non-logical individuals along with the original logical connectives, first-order logic includes propositional logic.
A structure is said to be a model of a theory if the language of is the same as the language of and every sentence in is satisfied by . Thus, for example, a "ring" is a structure for the language of rings that satisfies each of the ring axioms, and a model of ZFC set theory is a structure in the language of set theory that satisfies each of the ...
Map between two sets with the same type of structure, which preserve this structure [morphism: structure in the domain is mapped properly to the (same type) structure in the codomain] is of special interest in many fields of mathematics. Examples are homomorphisms, which preserve algebraic structures; continuous functions, which preserve ...
The phrase structure rules of context free grammar, for instance, were generating sentence structure top down. The Minimalist view that Merge is strictly binary is justified with the argument that an n {\displaystyle n} -ary Merge where n ≥ 3 {\displaystyle n\geq 3} would inevitably lead to both under and overgeneration, and as such Merge ...
The expression "mathematical proof" is used by lay people to refer to using mathematical methods or arguing with mathematical objects, such as numbers, to demonstrate something about everyday life, or when data used in an argument is numerical. It is sometimes also used to mean a "statistical proof" (below), especially when used to argue from data.
A valid number sentence that is true: 83 + 19 = 102. A valid number sentence that is false: 1 + 1 = 3. A valid number sentence using a 'less than' symbol: 3 + 6 < 10. A valid number sentence using a 'more than' symbol: 3 + 9 > 11. An example from a lesson plan: [6] Some students will use a direct computational approach.