Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Australian courts and tribunals have now adopted a neutral citation standard for case law. The format provides a naming system that does not depend on the publication of the case in a law report. Most cases are now published on AustLII using neutral citations. [10] The standard format looks like this:
Articles on cases that are primarily notable for the legal precedent they set, or are primarily discussed within legal scholarship, should be titled according to the legal citation convention for the jurisdiction that handled the case. However, do not adjust a name that is common within legal citations to conform with contemporary style guides.
These cases are well-established conventions recognized in most style guides. Do not apply italics to other categories or instances because you feel they are creative or artful (e.g. game or sport moves, logical arguments, "artisanal" products, schools of practice or thought, etc.). Court case names: FCC v. Pacifica.
The opinion number, often the number of the first page of the case. String: suggested: Pinpoint citation: pinpoint: Identifies a specific part of a decision, typically by page or paragraph number. String: optional: Court name: court: The standard abbreviation for the court being cited. Example 3d Cir. String: suggested: Date: date year
The main purpose of the system is to fulfill the legal obligation of the Clerk of Court as custodian of court records. Each case is assigned a number in the format D:YY-TT-SSSSS where D=Division Office (most districts are split into divisions), YY=Year, TT=Type (e.g. bk=bankruptcy, cv=civil, cr=criminal), SSSSS=Sequence number.
The case is reported in volume 381 of the United States Reports (abbreviated "U.S."). The case begins on page 479 of that volume of the report. The authoritative supporting material for the writer's proposition is on page 480. The reference to page 480 is referred to as a "pincite" or "pinpoint." The Supreme Court decided the case.
"In the case at hand, to prove the higher degree of distinctiveness, the opponent merely submitted an excerpt from the online encyclopaedia "Wikipedia" to show that the opponent's company is the third largest mobile operator in Germany with more than 8.5 million subscribers as of 2004.
Page: page p: The number of a single page in the source that supports the content; displays after 'p.'; use either page= or pages=, but not both. String: optional: Page(s) cited: pages pp: A range of pages in the source that support the content (not an indication of the number of pages in the source); displays after 'pp.'; use either page= or ...