Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Richard E. Roeper (born October 17, 1959) [1] is an American columnist and film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times.He co-hosted the television series At the Movies with Roger Ebert from 2000 to 2008, serving as the late Gene Siskel's successor.
On-screen graphic from Roger Ebert & the Movies. Ebert continued the show with a series of guest critics. [28] [29] Originally retaining the Siskel & Ebert title, the program was renamed Roger Ebert & the Movies on the weekend of September 4–5, 1999, after Siskel's death. The guests matched wits with Ebert and tested their chemistry.
In September 2000, Chicago Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper and later Ebert & Roeper. [5] [61] In 2000, Ebert interviewed President Bill Clinton about movies at The White House. [62] In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the salivary glands.
At the Movies (1982 TV program), an American program, originally known as At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. At the Movies (1986 TV program), a successor/competitor program (1986–2010) to the original, which was also known as Siskel & Ebert & the Movies; Ebert Presents: At the Movies, a successor program (2011)
At the Movies (also known as At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert) is an American movie review television program that aired from 1982 to 1990. It was produced by Tribune Entertainment and was created by Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert when they left their show Sneak Previews, which they began on Chicago's PBS station, WTTW, in 1975.
On Ebert and Roeper, critics Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times both gave the film a thumbs down, although Ebert showed some sympathy toward the film, stating that it had "clever dialogue", but was "...too disorganized for me to recommend it". Roeper called the film "a disaster" and "one of the worst movies I've ever seen".
The film was released to ... Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times considered the ... Richard Roeper of ReelzChannel called the film "one of the worst movies ...
Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper were divided on their show At the Movies; in his column, Ebert praised the film as "written, acted and directed as a story, not as an exercise in mindless kinetic energy", awarding it three out of four stars. Conversely, Roeper wrote, "I don't think there's anything wrong with an escapist adventure, but if you're ...