enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mondegreen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondegreen

    A mondegreen (/ ˈ m ɒ n d ɪ ˌ ɡ r iː n / ⓘ) is a mishearing or misinterpretation of a phrase in a way that gives it a new meaning. [1] Mondegreens are most often created by a person listening to a poem or a song; the listener, being unable to hear a lyric clearly, substitutes words that sound similar and make some kind of sense.

  3. Misrepresentation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

    In common law jurisdictions, a misrepresentation is a false or misleading [1] statement of fact made during negotiations by one party to another, the statement then inducing that other party to enter into a contract.

  4. Misinformation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation

    Misinformation is often used as an umbrella term to refer to many types of false information; more specifically it may refer to false information that is not shared to intentionally deceive or cause harm. [20]

  5. Miscommunication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscommunication

    Is this a duck or a rabbit? Are these two faces or is it a vase?. Miscommunication ("mis" + "communication") is the failure of communicating clearly the intended message or idea. [1]

  6. They Left for Their Own Country by Another Path - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/left-own-country-another-path...

    It begins with a persistent, urgent call, one that any entirely rational person—including the one being called—might reasonably suspect is a matter of fanciful misinterpretation and seek out a ...

  7. Quoting out of context - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoting_out_of_context

    Quoting out of context (sometimes referred to as contextomy or quote mining) is an informal fallacy in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning. [1]

  8. Jumping to conclusions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_to_conclusions

    Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion [1]) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions".

  9. Misuse of statistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misuse_of_statistics

    To promote a neutral (useless) product, a company must find or conduct, for example, 40 studies with a confidence level of 95%. If the product is useless, this would produce one study showing the product was beneficial, one study showing it was harmful, and thirty-eight inconclusive studies (38 is 95% of 40).