enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Honest services fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud

    Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (the federal mail and wire fraud statute), added by the United States Congress in 1988. [1] The idea of this law was to criminalize not only schemes to defraud victims of money and property, but also schemes to defraud victims of intangible rights such as the "honest services" of a public official.

  3. Skilling v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skilling_v._United_States

    Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1346.The case involves former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling and the honest services fraud statute, which prohibits "a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services".

  4. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    Several statutes, mostly codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, provide for federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States.Federal prosecutions of public corruption under the Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, the Travel Act (enacted 1961), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt ...

  5. McDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_v._United_States

    Laws applied Hobbs Act , Honest services fraud United States , 579 U.S. 550 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the appeal of former Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell's conviction for honest services fraud and Hobbs Act extortion.

  6. Percoco v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percoco_v._United_States

    Percoco v. United States, 598 U.S. 319, is a 2023 United States Supreme Court case regarding the federal honest services fraud statute. In the case, the Court held that a private citizen with significant influence over government decision-making cannot be convicted of honest services fraud for actions taken while not holding public office.

  7. Mandatory prison was key to George Santos deal, US prosecutor ...

    www.aol.com/news/mandatory-prison-key-george...

    George Santos' willingness to spend a minimum two years in prison was a critical part of his agreement to plead guilty to fraud and identity theft, the federal prosecutor who charged the scandal ...

  8. List of United States state officials convicted of federal ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), [1] the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, [2] the Travel Act (enacted 1961), [3] the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (enacted 1970), [4] and the federal program bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666 (enacted 1984), [5] permit the ...

  9. Trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Kenneth_Lay_and...

    In June 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out the honest services fraud statute in a unanimous decision; the case went before Lake again, to sort out which counts must be dismissed in light of the Supreme Court ruling and then re-sentence Skilling again.