enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Biological patents in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_patents_in_the...

    An early example of a food patent is the patent granted to RiceTec for basmati rice in 1997. [6] In 1999, a patent was filed for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich that was without crust. [7] Agriculture giant Monsanto filed for a patent on certain pig genes in 2004. [8]

  3. Patentable subject matter in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter...

    Therefore, there was nothing left on which a patent could issue. In a case in which a patent was sought on an implementation of a principle (the algorithm), the implementation itself must be inventive for a patent to issue. Since that was not so, the Court held that the patent office had properly rejected Flook's claim to a patent.

  4. Patentable subject matter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter

    Patentable, statutory or patent-eligible subject matter is subject matter of an invention that is considered appropriate for patent protection in a given jurisdiction. The laws and practices of many countries stipulate that certain types of inventions should be denied patent protection.

  5. The Court Ruling That Says 'You Can't Patent Nature' - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-03-30-the-court-ruling...

    It says: "[W]e do not believe that the final outcome of this litigation will have a material impact on Myriad's operations due to the patent protection afforded Myriad by its remaining patents."

  6. Bowman v. Monsanto: The Price We All Pay for Roundup ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/on-monsanto-gmo-roundup-ready...

    Monsanto says it does not "exercise its patent rights where trace amounts of our patented traits are present in farmers' fields as a result of inadvertent means." In 2007, the company sued Bowman ...

  7. Justice Department: Genes Are Not Patentable - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-11-01-justice-department...

    The U.S. Department of Justice has reversed its stance on the longstanding practice of patenting genes, now saying that genes should not be patentable. If the new position ends up taking effect at ...

  8. Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk_Bros._Seed_Co._v...

    Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that a facially trivial implementation of a natural principle or phenomenon of nature is not eligible for a patent. [1]

  9. Bowman v. Monsanto Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowman_v._Monsanto_Co.

    Bowman v. Monsanto Co., 569 U.S. 278 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court patent decision in which the Court unanimously affirmed the decision of the Federal Circuit that the patent exhaustion doctrine does not permit a farmer to plant and grow saved, patented seeds without the patent owner's permission. [1]