enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dissenting opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissenting_opinion

    Legal andjudicial opinions. A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a legal case in certain legal systems written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court which gives rise to its judgment. Dissenting opinions are normally written at the same time as the majority opinion and any concurring ...

  3. Dissent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissent

    Dissent is an opinion, philosophy or sentiment of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea or policy enforced under the authority of a government, political party or other entity or individual. A dissenting person may be referred to as a dissenter.

  4. Judicial opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_opinion

    Per curiam opinion. Seriatim opinion. v. t. e. A judicial opinion is a form of legal opinion written by a judge or a judicial panel in the course of resolving a legal dispute, providing the decision reached to resolve the dispute, and usually indicating the facts which led to the dispute and an analysis of the law used to arrive at the decision.

  5. Per curiam decision - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_curiam_decision

    Seriatim opinion. v. t. e. In law, a per curiam decision or opinion (sometimes called an unsigned opinion) is one that is not authored by or attributed to a specific judge, but rather to the entire court or panel of judges who heard the case. [1] The term per curiam is Latin for 'by the court'. [2]

  6. Sotomayor's dissent: A president should not be a 'king above ...

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayors-dissent-president...

    In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against ...

  7. Marbury v. Madison - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States. Decided in 1803, Marbury is regarded as the single most ...

  8. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity. The plaintiff, Gerald Bostock, was fired from his county job after he ...

  9. The Constitution is not a suicide pact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Constitution_is_not_a...

    The Constitution is not a suicide pact. " The Constitution is not a suicide pact " is a phrase in American political and legal discourse. The phrase expresses the belief that constitutional restrictions on governmental power must be balanced against the need for survival of the state and its people. It is most often attributed to Abraham ...