Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Thus the FP16 (or 16-bit integer) FLOPS is twice the FP32 (or 32-bit integer) FLOPS. Since the throughput of FP64 instructions is one per 2 cycles, the FP64 FLOPS is a quarter of the FP32 FLOPS. Each Subslice contains 8 EUs and a sampler (4 tex/clk [47]), and has 64 KB shared memory. Intel Quick Sync Video
Double-precision floating-point format (sometimes called FP64 or float64) is a floating-point number format, usually occupying 64 bits in computer memory; it represents a wide range of numeric values by using a floating radix point. Double precision may be chosen when the range or precision of single precision would be insufficient.
The LINPACK benchmark report appeared first in 1979 as an appendix to the LINPACK user's manual. [4]LINPACK was designed to help users estimate the time required by their systems to solve a problem using the LINPACK package, by extrapolating the performance results obtained by 23 different computers solving a matrix problem of size 100.
FLOPS can be recorded in different measures of precision, for example, the TOP500 supercomputer list ranks computers by 64 bit (double-precision floating-point format) operations per second, abbreviated to FP64. [9] Similar measures are available for 32-bit (FP32) and 16-bit (FP16) operations.
Collection of the x87 family of math coprocessors by Intel. A floating-point unit (FPU), numeric processing unit (NPU), [1] colloquially math coprocessor, is a part of a computer system specially designed to carry out operations on floating-point numbers. [2] Typical operations are addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and square root.
Intel's removal from the Dow doesn't really impact the business, but it will lead exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the Dow to sell the stock when the Dow makes the switch on Nov. 8.
The semiconductor company's share price was down 5.8% as of 2 p.m. ET. Intel stock is losing ground today following skeptical coverage from Bank of America (BofA) analysts.
Intel's market dominance (at one time [when?] it controlled over 85% of the market for 32-bit x86 microprocessors) combined with Intel's own hardball legal tactics (such as its infamous 338 patent suit versus PC manufacturers) [187] made it an attractive target for litigation, culminating in Intel agreeing to pay AMD $1.25 billion and grant ...