Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, in Arizona, the family purpose doctrine is applied very broadly and holds parents liable even for the negligence of a child driving a motor vehicle in defiance of driving restrictions placed upon him. [10] In Georgia, the 'family purpose' liability extends to third parties allowed by the teenage driver to operate the car.
Striped: Both safety and emissions testing required. In the United States, vehicle safety inspection and emissions inspection are governed by each state individually. Fifteen states have a periodic (annual or biennial) safety inspection program, while Maryland requires a safety inspection and Alabama requires a VIN inspection on sale or transfer of vehicles which were previously registered in ...
If both you and your parent co-own the vehicle, then most insurance carriers allow you to stay on your parents policy. Your parents own the car and you live with them. If your parents are the ...
Same-day car insurance means you select the coverage options you need for a car insurance policy, agree to the quote provided, make the necessary payment and choose to put your policy into effect ...
Typically, these laws obligate adult children (or depending on the state, other family members) to pay for their indigent parents’/relatives' food, clothing, shelter and medical needs. Should the children fail to provide adequately, they allow nursing homes and government agencies to bring legal action to recover the cost of caring for the ...
Jul. 1—AUSTIN — The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) reminds Texans of upcoming changes to the state's Vehicle Safety Inspection Program that will eliminate most vehicle safety inspections.
An inspection sticker from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts A Warrant of Fitness certificate issued to vehicles in New Zealand. Vehicle inspection is a procedure mandated by national or subnational governments in many countries, in which a vehicle is inspected to ensure that it conforms to regulations governing safety, emissions, or both.
The attractive nuisance doctrine emerged from case law in England, starting with Lynch v. Nurdin in 1841. In that case, an opinion by Lord Chief Justice Thomas Denman held that the owner of a cart left unattended on the street could be held liable for injuries to a child who climbed onto the cart and fell. [3]