enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Presumption of guilt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_guilt

    It has also been said that this is a myth, [10] as well as a former "common conceit of English lawyers" who asserted this was the case in France. [11] [12] A presumption of guilt is incompatible with the presumption of innocence and moves an accusational system of justice toward the inquisitional. [13]

  3. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  4. Coffin v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_v._United_States

    It is the duty of the judge, in all jurisdictions, when requested, and in some when not requested, to explain the presumption of innocence to the jury in his charge. The usual formula in which this doctrine is expressed is that every man is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Court membership; Chief Justice

  5. Griffin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_v._California

    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, by a 6–2 vote, that it is a violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights for the prosecutor to comment to the jury on the defendant's declining to testify, or for the judge to instruct the jury that such silence is evidence of guilt.

  6. Holmes v. South Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holmes_v._South_Carolina

    The trial court excluded Holmes' third-party guilt evidence based on State v. Gregory, 16 S.E.2d 532 (S.C. 1941), in which the South Carolina Supreme Court had held that such evidence is only admissible if it "raises a reasonable inference or presumption as to [the defendant's] own innocence." Holmes was subsequently convicted again.

  7. Brady v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).

  8. Moral Injury: The Grunts - The ... - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/moral-injury/the-grunts

    A moral injury, researchers and psychologists are finding, can be as simple and profound as losing a loved comrade. Returning combat medics sometimes bear the guilt of failing to save someone badly wounded; veterans tell of the sense of betrayal when a buddy is hurt because of a poor decision made by those in charge.

  9. Consciousness of guilt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_of_guilt

    Evidence of post-crime conduct that may in the context of a particular case evince a defendant's consciousness of guilt of the offense with which the defendant is charged is admissible. A consciousness of guilt may, for example, be evinced by a false alibi or explanation for one's actions, intimidation of a witness, destruction or concealment ...