enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Breach of contract - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract

   The reason for a defaulting party committing an actual breach is generally irrelevant to whether it constitutes a breach, or whether the breach is a repudiation (this is an incident of strict liability for the performance of contractual obligations). However, the reason may be highly relevant to what such breach would lead the reasonable ...

3. Exclusion clause - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusion_clause

   There are various methods by which a party may seek to exclude or mitigate liability by use of a contractual term: True exclusion clause: The clause recognizes a potential breach of contract, and then excuses liability for the breach. Alternatively, the clause is constructed in such a way it only includes reasonable care to perform duties on ...

4. Hadley v Baxendale - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_v_Baxendale

   Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a leading English contract law case. It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen.

5. Civil wrong - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_wrong

   Types include tort, breach of contract and breach of trust. [1] Something that amounts to a civil wrong is wrongful. A wrong involves the violation of a right because wrong and right are contrasting terms. [2]

6. Legal liability - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability

   Legal liability concerns both civil law and criminal law and can arise from various areas of law, such as contracts, torts, taxes, or fines given by government agencies. The claimant is the one who seeks to establish, or prove, liability.

7. Tortious interference - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference

   Inducing a breach of contract was a tort of accessory liability, and an intention to cause a breach of contract was a necessary and sufficient requirement for liability; a person had to know that he was inducing a breach of contract and to intend to do so; that a conscious decision not to inquire into the existence of a fact could be treated as ...