Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A bijective function, f: X → Y, from set X to set Y demonstrates that the sets have the same cardinality, in this case equal to the cardinal number 4. Aleph-null, the smallest infinite cardinal. In mathematics, a cardinal number, or cardinal for short, is what is commonly called the number of elements of a set.
Cardinal arithmetic can be used to show not only that the number of points in a real number line is equal to the number of points in any segment of that line, but that this is equal to the number of points on a plane and, indeed, in
Cardinal functions are widely used in topology as a tool for describing various topological properties. [2] [3] Below are some examples.(Note: some authors, arguing that "there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology", [4] prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never taken on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the ...
Cardinal functions are widely used in topology as a tool for describing various topological properties. [4] [5] Below are some examples.(Note: some authors, arguing that "there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology", [6] prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never take on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the definitions ...
In set theory, a regular cardinal is a cardinal number that is equal to its own cofinality. More explicitly, this means that κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is a regular cardinal if and only if every unbounded subset C ⊆ κ {\displaystyle C\subseteq \kappa } has cardinality κ {\displaystyle \kappa } .
These properties are used to justify cardinal multiplication. Given two sets X and Y, the set of all functions from Y to X is denoted by X Y. Then the following statements hold: If A ~ B and C ~ D then A C ~ B D. A B ∪ C ~ A B × A C for disjoint B and C. (A × B) C ~ A C × B C (A B) C ~ A B×C; These properties are used to justify cardinal ...
Beyond the problem of defining set representatives for ordinal numbers, Scott's trick can be used to obtain representatives for cardinal numbers and more generally for isomorphism types, for example, order types of linearly ordered sets (Jech 2003:65).
In modern set theory, we usually use the Von Neumann cardinal assignment, which uses the theory of ordinal numbers and the full power of the axioms of choice and replacement. Cardinal assignments do need the full axiom of choice, if we want a decent cardinal arithmetic and an assignment for all sets.