enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ross

    United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States.The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well.

  3. National Pork Producers Council v. Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Pork_Producers...

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of California dismissed the lawsuit, with judge Thomas Whelan stating that Proposition 12 did not attempt to fully regulate the pork industry in other states. [2] The ruling was upheld in a 3-0 decision at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [1]

  4. Ross v. Blake - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_v._Blake

    Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "special circumstances" cannot excuse an inmate's failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing a lawsuit under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, [1] but clarified that inmates are required to exhaust only administrative remedies that are genuinely available. [2]

  5. NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NXIVM_Corp._v._Ross_Institute

    NXIVM Corp. v. The Ross Institute, 364 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004), [1] was a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision that held that the defendant's critical analysis of material obtained in bad faith, i.e., in violation of a non-disclosure agreement, was fair use since the secondary use was transformative as criticism and was not a potential replacement for the original on ...

  6. United States v. Robinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Robinson

    United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that "in the case of a lawful custodial arrest a full search of the person is not only an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment, but is also a reasonable search under that Amendment."

  7. Carroll v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_v._United_States

    Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld the warrantless searches of an automobile, which is known as the automobile exception. The case has also been cited as widening the scope of search.

  8. United States v. Place - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Place

    United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for a trained police dog to sniff of a person's luggage or property in a public place.

  9. Franks v. Delaware - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franks_v._Delaware

    Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with defendants' rights to challenge evidence collected on the basis of a warrant granted on the basis of a false statement. The court held that where a warrant affidavit contains a statement, necessary to the finding of probable cause, that is demonstrated ...