enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Closing argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closing_argument

    A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at ...

  3. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    Summary judgment in the United States applies only in civil cases. It does not apply to criminal cases to obtain a pretrial judgment of conviction or acquittal, in part because a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial. [4] Some federal and state-court judges publish general guidelines and sample summary judgment forms.

  4. Law of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_California

    The Judicial Council of California has also promulgated the California Rules of Court, which includes such publications as the Standards of Judicial Administration and the Ethics Standards for Neutral Arbitrators in Contractual Arbitrations, under the authority of article VI, section 6, of the Constitution of California.

  5. Judicial Council of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Council_of_California

    The Judicial Council of California is the rule-making arm of the California court system. [1] In accordance with the California Constitution and under the leadership of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of California, the council is responsible for "ensuring the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice."

  6. Legal formalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_formalism

    Legal formalism is both a descriptive and normative theory of how judges should decide cases. [1] In its descriptive sense, formalists maintain that judges reach their decisions by applying uncontroversial principles to the facts; formalists believe that there is an underlying logic to the many legal principles that may be applied in different cases.

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  8. Civil procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_procedure

    These rules govern how a lawsuit or case may be commenced; what kind of service of process (if any) is required; the types of pleadings or statements of case, motions or applications, and orders allowed in civil cases; the timing and manner of depositions and discovery or disclosure; the conduct of trials; the process for judgment; the process ...

  9. Judiciary of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_California

    In practice, this works out to about 16,000 appeals per year, resulting in 12,000 opinions (not all appeals are pursued properly or are meritorious enough to justify an opinion). Under the common law, judicial opinions themselves have legal effect through the rule of stare decisis. But because of their crushing caseloads (about 200 matters per ...

  1. Related searches summation vs summarization california rules of judicial practice forms free

    judiciary of californiasummary judgment before a court