enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  3. Supreme Court delivers blow to wetlands protections in win ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-rules-idaho-landowners...

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday significantly weakened a landmark water pollution law by ruling that an Idaho couple's property does not include wetlands subject to federal oversight ...

  4. Supreme Court rules on wetlands. Here’s how it affects ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-wetlands...

    The U.S. Supreme Court set a more narrow definition of what constitutes a wetland. Supreme Court rules on wetlands. Here’s how it affects California environment protections

  5. States at the forefront of fights over wetlands protections ...

    www.aol.com/news/states-forefront-fights-over...

    A month after the U.S. Supreme Court severely restricted the federal government's power to oversee wetlands, the Republican-dominated North Carolina legislature handed state agencies an order: Don ...

  6. EPA slashes federally protected waters by more than half ...

    www.aol.com/epa-significantly-shrinks-qualifies...

    The Environmental Protection Agency and US Army on Tuesday released a new rule that slashes federally protected water by more than half, following a Supreme Court decision in May that rolled back ...

  7. National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Federation_of...

    Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), is a Supreme Court of the United States case before the Court on an application for a stay of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccination or test mandate. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court ordered a stay of the mandate. [1]

  8. Flood risks rise as federal wetlands protections disappear ...

    www.aol.com/flood-risks-rise-federal-wetlands...

    Wetlands, like this one along the South Carolina coast, often get in the way of development. Environmental laws to protect wetlands have been eased with a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

  9. National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vaccine_Injury...

    Hastings concluded in his decision, "Unfortunately, the Cedillos have been misled by physicians who are guilty, in my view, of gross medical misjudgment." [37] The ruling was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, [12] and upheld. On March 13, 2010, the court ruled in three test cases that thimerosal-containing vaccines do not cause autism ...