enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_v._Texas_Division...

    Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license plates are government speech and are consequently more easily regulated/subjected to content restrictions than private speech under the First Amendment.

  3. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

    These remaining two lawsuits were dismissed without comment by the Supreme Court on February 22, 2021. [103] On April 19, 2021, more than five months after the November 3, 2020, election, the Supreme Court declined to hear the outstanding case brought by former Republican congressional candidate Jim Bognet, dismissing it without comment. [104]

  4. City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Austin_v._Reagan...

    The case was first filed in a state district court before the city moved it to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in 2017. [2] The district court selected to review the matter under intermediate scrutiny based on Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego, rather than the strict scrutiny content-based standard of Reed v.

  5. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  6. Red wave in Texas appellate courts, two flipped in Democratic ...

    www.aol.com/red-wave-texas-appellate-courts...

    Of Texas’ 15 appellate courts, each has a chief justice and between 3 and 13 justices that rule on cases; 83 justices serve statewide overall. Republicans swept races in five courts

  7. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  8. Nixon v. Condon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._Condon

    In Nixon v.Herndon (1927), the Court had struck down a Texas statute that prohibited blacks from participating in the Texas Democratic primary election.Very shortly after that decision, the Texas Legislature repealed the invalidated statute, declared that the effect of the Nixon decision was to create an emergency requiring immediate action, and replaced the old statute with a new one.

  9. Aguilar v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aguilar_v._Texas

    Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that "[a]lthough an affidavit supporting a search warrant may be based on hearsay information and need not reflect the direct personal observations of the affiant, the magistrate must be informed of some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information and some ...