enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jay-Z’s Accuser Can Remain Anonymous, Judge ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/entertainment/jay-z-accuser-remain...

    The woman accusing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs of sexually assaulting her when she was 13 can proceed anonymously (“at least for now”) in her lawsuit against the rappers, a judge ruled ...

  3. Arizona Supreme Court says anonymous juries constitutional - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/arizona-supreme-court-says...

    The Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that state courts can keep juror identities secret, rejecting a challenge from a southern Arizona journalist who argued that the right to observe trials ...

  4. Alabama v. White - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alabama_v._White

    Alabama v. White, 496 US 325 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Fourth Amendment.The majority opinion ruled that anonymous tips can provide reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop provided that police can factually verify the circumstances asserted by the tip.

  5. Judge restricts access to jurors’ identities in Trump hush ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-restricts-access-jurors...

    While Trump and attorneys in the case will know the identities of the jurors, their names will be shielded from the press and the public, Judge Juan Merchan said in his order, citing "a likelihood ...

  6. Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District Court for ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_Online_Speakers...

    After reviewing the posted content in the case, the court classified the anonymous postings and videos as commercial speech. For this reason, the Ninth Circuit rejected the district court's application of the Cahill standard applied by the lower court, because the case did not involve commercial speech, but political speech.

  7. Innominate jury - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innominate_jury

    An innominate jury, also known as an anonymous jury, is a jury whose members are kept anonymous by court order.This may be requested by the prosecution or defense in order to protect the jury from the media, potential jury tampering, or social pressure to return a particular verdict.

  8. Navarette v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navarette_v._California

    Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (2014), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when police officers may make arrests or conduct temporary detentions based on information provided by anonymous tips. [1]

  9. Florida v. J. L. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._J._L.

    Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that a police officer may not legally stop and frisk someone based solely on an anonymous tip that describes a person's location and appearance, but does not furnish information as to any illegal conduct.