Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Some attorneys and civil liberties advocates emphasize that in an illegal search, even if cops acted in good faith with a warrant, the result is the same: someone’s rights are violated.
When police confiscate [2] or destroy a citizen's photographs or recordings of officers' misconduct, the police's act of destroying the evidence may be prosecuted as an act of evidence tampering, if the recordings being destroyed are potential evidence in a criminal or regulatory investigation of the officers themselves. [9]
Police misconduct is inappropriate conduct and illegal actions taken by police officers in connection with their official duties. Types of misconduct include among others: sexual offences, coerced false confession, intimidation, false arrest, false imprisonment, falsification of evidence, spoliation of evidence, police perjury, witness tampering, police brutality, police corruption, racial ...
Getting a search warrant begins in a police department and ends with a specific, restricted list of items allowed to be seized on a specific property.
At any time, police may approach a person and ask questions. Police may suspect involvement in a crime, but may lack knowledge of any "specific and articulable facts" [9] that would justify a detention or arrest, and hope to obtain these facts from the questioning. The person approached is not required to identify themselves or answer any other ...
False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case (including the police/prosecution in a criminal case), or by someone
If the police search your phone without a search warrant or qualifying exigent ... The judge can decide to toss out any evidence and information gathered from an illegal search. Show comments.
Because police would not have obtained the fingerprints without the illegal arrest, the prints are “fruit of the poisonous tree.” [24] Other examples of evidence inadmissible under this doctrine include: Evidence seized during a search, where the probable cause for the search was illegally obtained evidence [25]