Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Example of a Dynamic Bayesian network. The first step concerns only Bayesian networks, and is a procedure to turn a directed graph into an undirected one. We do this because it allows for the universal applicability of the algorithm, regardless of direction. The second step is setting variables to their observed value.
The same technique may also be applied to the joint alignment of other sequences. Structural information between sequences also exists in DNA and amino acids data. For example, the sequences between related species are more similar compared with sequences from more remotely related species. This information could be utilized by GTW.
Let us now apply Euler's method again with a different step size to generate a second approximation to y(t n+1). We get a second solution, which we label with a (). Take the new step size to be one half of the original step size, and apply two steps of Euler's method. This second solution is presumably more accurate.
Computational methods are available for generating pseudo-random vectors from elliptical distributions, for use in Monte Carlo simulations for example. [3] Some elliptical distributions are alternatively defined in terms of their density functions. An elliptical distribution with a density function f has the form:
The first detail to note is that the way the priority queue handles ties can have a significant effect on performance in some situations. If ties are broken so the queue behaves in a LIFO manner, A* will behave like depth-first search among equal cost paths (avoiding exploring more than one equally optimal solution).
John Tukey expanded on the technique in 1958 and proposed the name "jackknife" because, like a physical jack-knife (a compact folding knife), it is a rough-and-ready tool that can improvise a solution for a variety of problems even though specific problems may be more efficiently solved with a purpose-designed tool.
The first one is when one chooses learning rate to be a constant <1/L, as mentioned above, if one can have a good estimate of L. The second is the so called diminishing learning rate, used in the well-known paper by Robbins & Monro (1951) , if again the function has globally Lipschitz continuous gradient (but the Lipschitz constant may be ...
For example, for the array of values [−2, 1, −3, 4, −1, 2, 1, −5, 4], the contiguous subarray with the largest sum is [4, −1, 2, 1], with sum 6. Some properties of this problem are: If the array contains all non-negative numbers, then the problem is trivial; a maximum subarray is the entire array.