Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 1 March 2025. War between two Italian city states (Bologna and Modena) in 1325 War of the Bucket Part of the second phase of the Guelphs–Ghibellines power struggle Date 1325 Location Emilia-Romagna, northern Italy Result Modenese Victory Belligerents Bologna (Guelph) Modena (Ghibelline) Commanders and ...
Date free Free type Metacritic ; Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden: Tales of Game's Studios Tales of Game's Studios RPG: Microsoft Windows, macOS: January 22, 2008 Freeware [9] 93 [10] The Battle for Wesnoth: David White and others David White and others Turn-based strategy: Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux: October 2005 October 2005 Freeware [11 ...
The Battle of Zappolino, the only battle of the War of the Oaken Bucket, was fought in November 1325 between forces representing the Italian towns of Bologna and Modena, an incident in the series of raids and reprisals between the two cities that were part of the larger conflicts of Guelphs and Ghibellines. The Modenese were victorious. [1]
1 Content from "The War of the Oaken Bucket" article. 2 comments. 2 References. Toggle the table of contents. Talk: La secchia rapita. Add languages.
A horror/action/adventure game: War of the Lance: 1989: AppII, C64, DOS A fantasy role-playing video game based in the Dungeons & Dragons Dragonlance campaign setting War Wind: 1996: Win A real-time strategy video game War Wind II: Human Onslaught: 1997: Win A real-time strategy video game: Wargame Construction Set: 1986: Amiga, ATR, C64, DOS, ST
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
This battle occurred in 1325. However the last sentence of the introduction refers to another battle in 1289 between the same factions, but is written in such a way that infers that 1289 follows 1325 instead of preceding it. The offending sentence seems to be a conclusion to a different paragraph: